Growing Opportunities: The Agricultural Chemical Security Credit

By Mas Kuwana, J.D., New York, NY, and Gary Hecimovich, CPA, Washington, DC

Editor: Jon Almeras, J.D., LL.M.

During these depressed economic times, taxpayers are increasingly confronted by issues related to cashflow management and the need to reduce taxes. In many cases, taxpayers are looking at all possible tax saving opportunities. There is a little-known tax credit opportunity that may bring additional benefit to taxpayers that deal with fertilizers and pesticides.

General Overview

In 2008, Congress enacted the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, P.L. 110-234 (the Farm Bill), over President Bush’s veto. This act included the agricultural chemical security credit, which is codified as Sec. 45O and is generally equal to 30% of the costs incurred toward securing “specified agricultural chemicals.” The credit includes specific limitations and overall is capped at $2 million per taxpayer per year. As a general business credit, it is reported on Form 3800, General Business Credit, and also on Form 8931, Agricultural Chemical Security Credit.

Eligible Taxpayers

Eligible taxpayers include sole proprietorships, partnerships, or corporations in the trade or business of:

  • Selling agricultural products, including specified agricultural chemicals, at retail, predominately to farmers and ranchers; or
  • Manufacturing, formulating, distributing, or aerially applying specified agricultural chemicals (Sec. 45O(e)).

In general, specified agricultural chemicals include most fertilizers and related hazardous chemicals that are commonly used within the agricultural industry (Sec. 45O(f)).

Taxpayers that may benefit from this credit include:

  • Manufacturers of fertilizers and pesticides;
  • Producers of the component chemicals that are used by other parties in the manufacture of fertilizers and pesticides;
  • Commercial distributers of fertilizers and pesticides; and
  • Taxpayers that aerially apply fertilizers and pesticides, such as farmers and ranchers or those engaged to aerially apply the chemicals to commercially raised livestock or commercially grown crops.

The broad nature of this provision suggests that it may apply to a large spectrum of taxpayers and most likely applies from the point at which the chemicals are produced to the point at which they are applied by the farmer or rancher. In other words, there may be opportunities to claim this credit at various points in the chemical’s life cycle.

Calculating the Credit

A taxpayer may claim the tax credit on the first $333,333.33 of qualified chemical security expenditures (per facility) that are paid or incurred after May 22, 2008, but on or before December 31, 2012. The maximum amount of credit is limited to $100,000 per facility (Sec. 45O(b)(1)), and there is an annual credit limitation of $2 million for each tax year (Sec. 45O(c)). Similar to the credit for research and development, the taxpayer is also required to add back a Schedule M adjustment for the portion of expenses that is equal to the amount of the credit (Sec. 280C(f)). For purposes of determining the amount of the credit for any tax year, controlled group aggregation and allocation rules similar to the rules governing research and development credits must be applied (Secs. 45O(b) and (c)).

Examples of qualified chemical security expenditures include:

  • Perimeter security;
  • Measures to control access to the facility and other restricted areas;
  • Identification systems;
  • Lighting, motion detectors, and other related security systems;
  • Efforts to deter theft and sabotage;
  • Security training, exercises, and drills;
  • Computer network security; and
  • Background checks for employees and visitors.

The Facility Limitation

The Code does not define the term “facility,” as used in Sec. 45O(b), and there is no guidance from Treasury or the IRS. Regulations related to this Code section were not included in the IRS’s 2009–2010 Priority Guidance Plan, released November 24, 2009. However, until the IRS publishes regulations or provides further guidance, taxpayers should look to analogous law. Specifically, the investment tax credit regulations and production tax credit rules define each energy-producing structure as a separate facility for purposes of computing the available tax credit. By analogy, this same approach might be applied to deem separate structures as separate facilities for purposes of applying the Sec. 45O(b) facility limitation. Any analysis would need to be performed on a case-by-case basis, and all facts and circumstances would need to be weighed. The end result of a careful analysis by the taxpayer may be that multiple facilities exist within a particular site.

Example: Taxpayer A is a manufacturer of fertilizers. A produces no other chemicals. A sells the fertilizers to taxpayer B. B sells the fertilizers to taxpayer C, who is in the business of farming. During 2009, A performs an analysis and determines that it has six facilities related to the production of fertilizer. For each facility, A incurs expenditures related to securing the fertilizer production process. Based on this information, A would calculate the credit as in the exhibit.

A has a total credit before limitation of $495,900. Because it does not exceed the $2 million annual limitation, A is entitled to claim the entire amount. In addition, since A did not meet the $100,000 cumulative credit per facility limit, there may be an opportunity to claim a credit for qualified expenditures for those facilities in future years (through December 31, 2012).

Finally, as noted earlier, A must add back the qualified expenditures as an unfavorable Schedule M adjustment. The total unfavorable adjustment is $495,900, which is the amount of qualified expenditures that is equal to the credit. Although A took the credit, the opportunity to take the credit may also be available to B and C.


Although enacted in 2008, this credit remains unknown to many taxpayers. Taxpayers that deal with fertilizers and pesticides should consider their own facts and circumstances to determine how the credit might apply.


Jon Almeras is a tax manager with Deloitte Tax LLP in Washington, DC.

This article does not constitute tax, legal, or other advice from Deloitte Tax LLP, which assumes no responsibility with respect to assessing or advising the reader as to tax, legal, or other consequences arising from the reader’s particular situation.

Unless otherwise noted, contributors are members of or associated with Deloitte Tax LLP.

For additional information about these items, contact Mr. Almeras at (202) 758-1437 or

Newsletter Articles


Directions in Individual Taxation

This article covers recent developments in the area of individual taxation, including the treatment of support payments and IRA and qualified plan distributions, the Sec. 469 material participation rules, and the taxability of state economic development credits.


2015 Tax Software Survey

See how nearly 5,000 paid CPA tax preparers rated the strengths and weakness of major tax preparation software products they used in 2015.