Final regulations issued on Friday clarify the tax treatment of certain terminations of qualified hedging transactions under Sec. 988.
Gains & Losses
It is not unusual for a taxpayer to make an error on a return that results in a misstatement of a net operating loss or a credit that is then carried forward. These mistakes might not be noticed until after the statute of limitation is closed.
The IRS issued more regulations that take aim at transactions that attempt to avoid the repeal of the General Utilities doctrine.
Temporary regulations prevent corporations from avoiding tax through the use of partnerships.
Proposed Regulations Would Require Gain or Loss Recognition on Certain Installment Obligation Transfers
The IRS issued proposed regulations that would require transferors that transfer installment obligations for equity interests in corporations or partnerships in nonrecognition transactions in satisfaction of those obligations to recognize gain or loss.
Pharmaceutical companies confront several tax differences when determining whether a transaction is a license or sale.
IRS clarified that the amendment to Sec. 56(d) made by the WHBAA did not create new ordering rules for absorbing ATNOLs.
The IRS issued proposed regulations relating to the nonrecognition of gain or loss on certain dispositions of an installment obligation.
The IRS finalized proposed regulations to update the rules that apply to U.S. taxpayers that fail to file gain recognition agreements when they transfer certain property to foreign corporations in nonrecognition transactions.
For many years, taxpayers have been able to defer recognition of gain on the disposition of assets by engaging in Sec. 1031 like-kind exchanges. Consequently, many questions and issues surrounding these transactions have been addressed, but many cases and rulings continue to arise each year. This article analyzes these cases and rulings and identifies questions that still need to be answered.
Change the character of a loss from ordinary to capital, and a taxpayer runs the risk of deferring or even failing to realize a tax benefit. While the general rules regarding characterization of gains or losses are well-known, more obscure statutory provisions can change an otherwise ordinary gain or loss into a capital gain or loss.
The Court of Federal Claims denied approximately $1.6 billion in cost basis related to decommissioning liabilities assumed in connection with the purchase of three nuclear power plants.
The IRS issued final regulations under Sec. 362(e)(2) that provide guidance on the determination of the bases of assets (including stock) transferred in certain nonrecognition transactions to which Sec. 362(e)(2) limitations on built-in losses apply.
Under Sec. 631(b), gains or losses from the sale of standing timber are considered gains and/or losses from the sale of business use property.
The existence of convertible debt, incentive stock options, warrants, and preferred stock, along with the need for additional capital, creates opportunities for tech companies to issue additional qualified small business stock in 2013.
The uncertainty surrounding the ordering rules of the 10% limit on the charitable deduction and the 90% limit on the ATNOL deduction has been affecting more corporate taxpayers as the economy recovers and these corporations start generating current-period taxable income.
While practitioners typically think of the application of the CERT rules in cases of debt-financed distributions or stock acquisitions, the rules could apply even if the underlying transaction is not debt-financed.
The IRS issued final regulations that provide guidance on the recognition of built-in gain in certain transfers of property from a C corporation to a RIC or REIT.
If a transaction satisfies the substantive tests for certain subchapter C nonrecognition provisions, can the taxpayer nonetheless achieve a taxable exchange by intentionally violating procedural requirements?
Qualifying for like-kind exchange treatment becomes more complicated if the property exchanged is “underwater”—that is, the debt on the property exceeds its fair market value.