The IRS issued proposed regulations on the time for taking into account deferred losses on the sale or exchange of property between members of a controlled group (REG-118761-09).
Determining whether a transaction is characterized as a reverse acquisition under the consolidated return regulations can be challenging. This item focuses on tax implications of reverse acquisitions and reviews recent private letter rulings in which the IRS applied substance-over-form principles.
The IRS issued proposed regulations on the time for taking into account deferred losses on the sale or exchange of property between members of a controlled group.
The IRS has modified the scope provision for corporations that exit a consolidated group and request consent to change their annual accounting periods.
This article discusses triggering events for dual consolidated losses and their consequences, as well as the transition rules from the 1992 to the 2007 regulations.
The 2007 dual consolidated loss regulations generally provide that a DCL of a dual-resident corporation or a separate unit of a U.S. corporation is not included in the computation of the taxable income of a consolidated group, unaffiliated DRC, or unaffiliated domestic owner.
Editor: Annette B. Smith, CPA Many independent professional medical and dental practices are incorporated under state law as professional corporations (PCs). Generally, these state laws require that PCs issue shares only to individuals who are duly licensed or otherwise legally authorized to render the same type of professional services as
Editor: Mary Van Leuven, J.D., LL.M. Often, a corporation will not qualify as a member of a consolidated group for its entire tax year. This could occur because an event (a “change in status”) causes the corporation to become or cease to be a member of the consolidated group on
Editor: Mary Van Leuven, J.D., LL.M. IRS Letter Ruling 200710004 breaks new ground in determining the character of a worthless stock deduction in a consolidated group. Due to the lack of direct authorities on point and the absence of clear statutory support for the ruling’s favorable conclusions, taxpayers might consider