Treasury and the IRS temporary regulations include rules for determining foreign income taxes deemed paid under Sec. 960, which pertains to the “deemed paid” foreign tax credit.
The IRS issued final regulations under the GILTI rules on the treatment of income subject to a high rate of foreign tax. At the same time, the IRS issued proposed rules conforming the GILTI high-tax exception rules with the Subpart F high-tax exception.
The IRS issued final regs. on the foreign-derived intangible income deduction and the global intangible low-taxed income provisions enacted by the TCJA.
A US company’s income earned by a Luxembourg subsidiary from sales of products made by a Mexican branch of the subsidiary is taxable as foreign base company sales income under Subpart F.
Methods of accounting may be an effective tool in tax planning for GILTI; however, method change procedures for CFCs differ from procedures for domestic taxpayers.
Under the right set of circumstances, there may be a significant opportunity for tax savings in Puerto Rico.
Until now, shareholders had rarely invoked the Sec. 962 election to be taxed at corporate rates, and, as a result, most states have provided no specific guidance on how to treat a Sec. 962 election for state income tax purposes.
One potentially important component of Subpart F income under Sec. 952(a)(4) is illegal bribes, kickbacks, or other payments made by or on behalf of a CFC to a foreign government official, employee, or agent.
This item highlights three often overlooked or misunderstood factors potentially disrupting international transactions.
U.S. shareholders who own stock in foreign corporations were given a safe harbor by the IRS, making it easier for them to establish that they are not shareholders in a controlled foreign corporation.
This discussion provides a summary of some of the basic previously taxed earnings and profits ordering rules likely to apply to distributions made by controlled foreign corporations .
The final rule allows a RIC invested in CFCs and PFICs to treat the required CFC inclusion or PFIC inclusion respectively, as qualifying income for purposes of a RIC’s qualifying income test.
Sec. 250 allows domestic corporations a deduction for their “foreign-derived intangible income.” Proposed regulations that were issued earlier this year answer many outstanding questions regarding the calculation of this new deduction but also include documentation requirements that may prove onerous for some taxpayers.
This discussion focuses on the GILTI and BEAT implications for the benefit received by a U.S. corporation reporting a worthless stock deduction under Sec. 165(g) for a CFC’s stock.
The IRS issued final regulations on the Sec. 951A global low-taxed income inclusion and foreign tax credits, finalizing proposed rules issued in October and December 2018.
The TCJA substantially modified Sec. 163(j) so that the business interest expense in a tax year is limited to the sum of the taxpayer’s business interest income, 30% of the taxpayer’s adjusted taxable income, and the taxpayer’s floor plan financing interest.
Delineating the international tax considerations for a blockchain enterprise, a new industry involving new technology with almost no regulatory guidance, can be difficult.
Only after careful examination of GILTI can U.S. taxpayers assess whether the TCJA benefits or harms their foreign earnings.
The IRS issues guidance for application of overpayments or refunds for taxpayers that opt to pay the Sec. 965 transition tax in eight annual installments.
In a changing landscape, U.S. C corporation multinationals should consider reevaluating their value chain.