Longer carried interest holding period includes S corporations
The IRS announced that the new three-year holding period for carried interests applies to S corporations as well as partnerships.
This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; others help us improve the user experience. By using the site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
The IRS announced that the new three-year holding period for carried interests applies to S corporations as well as partnerships.
This article reviews and analyzes recent law changes as well as rulings and decisions involving partnerships.
Before a partnership files for bankruptcy, a financial professional should assess the nature of its debts.
A CCA memorandum addressed the allocation of partnership losses where certain partners had negative capital account balances.
Investors in a partnership were not entitled to deduct credits because the investment transaction was structured solely to facilitate the purchase of the credits.
Tax Court held that amounts passthrough business entities paid to a purported insurance company they owned were not premiums paid for insurance contracts and not deductible.
To ease the regulatory burden on partnerships, the IRS announced that it is eliminating the requirement that partnership elections under Sec. 754 be signed by a partner.
Tax Court affirmed the IRS’s decision to recharacterize loss of a partnership disposition from ordinary to capital when the taxpayers failed to provide evidence of abandonment.
To ease the regulatory burden on partnerships, the IRS announced that it is eliminating the requirement that partnership elections under Sec. 754 be signed by a partner.
A preparer’s improper change of status of income from active to passive is costly for taxpayers.
Should the IRS consider recognizing a contributing partner’s economic risk of loss when the regulations are finalized?
A responsible person may be subject to the TFRP if it can be shown he or she willfully failed to pay the trust fund taxes due.
Treasury and the IRS issued regulations that generally override nonrecognition treatment for certain contributions of property to partnerships.
Sec. 743(b) adjustments are complex, and multitier partnership structures only exacerbate that complexity.
The Tax Court held that a taxpayer had not elected to group two activities together under the passive activity loss rules simply by treating both activities as nonpassive.
This article reviews and analyzes recent law changes as well as rulings and decisions involving partnerships.
Including “bad boy” provisions in loan agreements is a common practice to protect the lender in the commercial real estate finance industry.
The optional basis adjustment election is an attempt to allow partners to correct certain discrepancies by affecting a transferee’s allocable basis in the underlying partnership assets.
New regulations provide rules for determining who is the “taxpayer” for purposes of applying the Sec. 108 discharge-of-indebtedness rules to a grantor trust or disregarded entity.
Property transfers between a partner and a partnership are considered to be a taxable sale of the property under certain circumstances.
DEDUCTIONS
Business meal deductions after the TCJA
This article discusses the history of the deduction of business meal expenses and the new rules under the TCJA and the regulations and provides a framework for documenting and substantiating the deduction.
TAX RELIEF
Quirks spurred by COVID-19 tax relief
This article discusses some procedural and administrative quirks that have emerged with the new tax legislative, regulatory, and procedural guidance related to COVID-19.