Expenses & Deductions
Proposed regulations change the paradigm for the tax treatment of compensation paid by a partnership situated below a publicly held corporation in an Up-C or UPREIT structure.
This item discusses the authority to consider when determining whether the general partner of an investment fund is engaged in a Sec. 162 trade or business.
This article discusses developments in the taxation of partnerships and partners, debt and income allocations, distributions, and basis adjustments.
Partnerships making guaranteed payments may want to consider restructuring them as priority profit allocations.
The proposed regulations provided much-anticipated rules for RICs with REIT income for purposes of Sec. 199A.
Aggregation may allow a taxpayer to claim a greater QBI deduction than if the wages and capital limitation was applied separately.
A note contributed to a partnership by an individual in exchange for an interest in the partnership was a bona fide debt.
Depending on how a taxpayer’s ownership is structured, the sale of a partnership interest can have a Sec. 280G impact on partners or members that are C corporations.
Lender Management contended that its activities met the test for an active trade or business under guidelines.
The new deduction allows certain business owners to keep pace with the significant corporate tax cut provided by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
Investors in a partnership were not entitled to deduct credits because the investment transaction was structured solely to facilitate the purchase of the credits.
Tax Court held that amounts passthrough business entities paid to a purported insurance company they
owned were not premiums paid for insurance contracts and not deductible.
Some unique issues can arise when computing the domestic production activities deduction for a passthrough entity.
Final regulations were issued on S corporation shareholder basis of indebtedness of the S corporation to the shareholder only if the indebtedness is bona fide and on the deductibility of startup expenditures and organizational expenses for partnerships following a termination of a partnership.
The IRS issued proposed regulations aimed at preventing partnerships from using technical terminations to accelerate their deductions of startup and organizational expenses.
Despite the widespread use of single-member LLCs, some confusion still exists regarding the tax treatment of the initial expenditures to form and operate this type of entity.
The IRS issued final regulations (T.D. 9542) governing elections by individual taxpayers, corporations, and partnerships to deduct start-up expenses or organizational expenditures.
The Sec. 179D deduction available for building designers has unexpected consequences for design firms structured as passthrough entities.
The IRS issued final regulations governing elections by individual taxpayers, corporations and partnerships to deduct startup expenses or organizational expenditures.
How to report the recapture of Sec. 179 expense for passthrough entities at both the entity and owner levels.