PTE deduction: Timing issues for accrual-method taxpayers
taxpayers and practitioners face uncertainty regarding the timing of the deduction provided for in Notice 2020-75.
This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; others help us improve the user experience. By using the site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
taxpayers and practitioners face uncertainty regarding the timing of the deduction provided for in Notice 2020-75.
This item highlights a few issues taxpayers should consider in income taxation, sales taxation, and unclaimed property/escheat reporting.
Complications of teleworking continue to arise, with each state making its own tax rules.
Small business owners describe scrambling to comply with varying sales tax compliance rules across a welter of jurisdictions.
An insufficient understanding of the rules can be dangerous to taxpayers when determining which entity has a filing responsibility in Tennessee.
To be deductible at the entity level, payments by passthrough entities of state and local taxes should be made in the tax year of the liability, but state-specific elections may complicate that timing, tax advocates advise.
The COVID-19 pandemic is forcing businesses to reevaluate tax obligations as the proliferation of remote working raises a broad array of state and local tax issues, including nexus, apportionment, compliance, and financial statement reporting.
This item discusses FASB Contingencies standards in the context of potential loss contingencies related to sales and use taxes.
The resolution creates the possibility that mobile workforce legislation, which the AICPA strongly supports, will be enacted this year.
The Senate voted to make room in the FY 2021 budget resolution for mobile workforce legislation. Details of the budget still must be negotiated, but the vote creates the possibility that mobile workforce legislation, which the AICPA strongly supports, will be enacted this year.
With the Oct. 15 corporate tax filing deadline looming and the global pandemic still affecting taxpayers and practitioners, several states have provided one-month filing relief for their corporate Oct. 15 deadlines.
This article discusses some procedural and administrative quirks that have emerged with the new tax legislative, regulatory, and procedural guidance related to COVID-19.
To promote nationwide consistency, the AICPA encourages states’ adoption of the MTC model statute that conforms to the new federal partnership audit regime.
This item summarizes some of the important changes impacting the New Jersey corporation business tax and when these changes took effect or will become effective.
Broad state adoption of the model statute developed by the AICPA in partnership with other major stakeholders will provide greater uniformity and increased compliance.
This item discusses new trends in states’ conformity with or decoupling from Sec. 965.
State are weighing the many consequences of federal tax reform.
California recently revamped its state tax agency system and the associated tax appeals process.
This item offers an overview of certain provisions in the regulations that could have state corporate income tax consequences.
The state of Nevada cannot apply Nevada law to award damages against the California Franchise Tax Board that are greater than it could award against a Nevada state agency in similar circumstances, the U.S. Supreme Court held.
DEDUCTIONS
Business meal deductions after the TCJA
This article discusses the history of the deduction of business meal expenses and the new rules under the TCJA and the regulations and provides a framework for documenting and substantiating the deduction.
TAX RELIEF
Quirks spurred by COVID-19 tax relief
This article discusses some procedural and administrative quirks that have emerged with the new tax legislative, regulatory, and procedural guidance related to COVID-19.