Leveraged spinoffs removed from IRS no-ruling list

By Sally P. Schreiber, J.D.

The IRS will once again issue letter rulings on leveraged spinoff transactions the agency announced, reversing a 2013 decision that put the transactions on its "no-ruling" list (Rev. Proc. 2017-38). The IRS will therefore once again issue private letter rulings on whether Sec. 355 or Sec. 361 applies to a distributing corporation's distribution of stock or securities of a controlled corporation in exchange for, and in retirement of, any putative debt of the distributing corporation if the distributing corporation debt is issued in anticipation of the distribution.

The revenue procedure, which modifies Rev. Proc. 2017-3 (the current-year no-ruling list) by deleting Section 5.01(4) of that revenue procedure, was effective May 9, 2017. The IRS has not issued rulings in this area since 2013, and, although it says it is still studying "concerning issues" in this area, it has decided that resuming issuing private letter rulings or determination letters in this area is in the interest of sound tax administration.

Before it stopped issuing rulings in this area, the IRS regularly issued rulings under Sec. 361(c) that, if certain conditions were met, a distributing corporation would not recognize gain or loss when it transferred controlled stock or securities in exchange for the distributing corporation's debt. These rulings originally involved old debt, but later involved debt that was issued more recently.

—Sally P. Schreiber (Sally.Schreiber@aicpa-cima.com) is a Tax Adviser senior editor.

Newsletter Articles

SPONSORED REPORT

CPEOs provide peace of mind around payroll services

The creation of these new IRS-certified service providers for small businesses clarifies some issues around traditional professional employer organizations.

PRACTICE MANAGEMENT

2016 Best Article Award

The winners of The Tax Adviser’s 2016 Best Article Award are Edward Schnee, CPA, Ph.D., and W. Eugene Seago, J.D., Ph.D., for their article, “Taxation of Worthless and Abandoned Partnership Interests.”