9100 Relief: It May Not Be Too Late After All

By Seth Kossman, Esq., LL.M., CPA, Baltimore

Editor: Valrie Chambers, Ph.D., CPA

Practice & Procedures

It is not uncommon for a tax professional to fail to make a timely election for a client. Depending on the particulars of the case, it may be advisable for the professional immediately to contact a malpractice carrier. Nevertheless, the Treasury regulations offer a form of relief allowing a late election, commonly known as "section 9100 relief." Two types of relief are offered by Regs. Secs. 301.9100-1 through -3—automatic relief and nonautomatic relief.

Regs. Sec. 301.9100-2 Automatic Relief

Taxpayers may take advantage of automatic relief by taking what the IRS calls "corrective action." Corrective action includes filing the election according to the particular election's procedures. If the taxpayer must file the election along with a tax return, corrective action includes filing the original or amended tax return. Additionally, corrective action includes ensuring that all other related filings are consistent with the election, including filings from other years.

The deadline for taking corrective action under Regs. Sec. 301.9100-2 automatic relief is either six months or 12 months, depending on the election the taxpayer missed. The nine elections that receive a 12-month extension include those:

  • To use a tax year other than that required under Sec. 444;
  • To use the last-in, first-out inventory method under Sec. 472; and
  • To adjust basis on partnership transfers and distributions under Sec. 754.

Other statutory and regulatory elections are granted a six-month automatic extension to take corrective action, as long as the election was due on the date the return was due, including extensions. However, if the election was due on the return's due date excluding extensions, the election is not granted the automatic six-month extension.

To take advantage of both the 12-month and six-month automatic extensions, the taxpayer must take corrective action within the deadline. However, an important difference between the 12-month and six-month extensions is whether the taxpayer had to timely file the return. Taxpayers can take advantage of the automatic six-month extension only if they timely filed the returns for the year in question. There is no such requirement for the 12-month extension.

Taxpayers taking advantage of automatic relief should send any return, statement of election, or other form that they must file to the same address to which the taxpayer would have sent it if it were timely filed. All documents filed as part of corrective action should state that they are "filed pursuant to §301.9100-2" across the top of the document. The automatic extension does not require a letter ruling or user fees.

Regs. Sec. 301.9100-3 Nonautomatic Relief

Nonautomatic relief applies only to elections whose due dates are set by regulation, not by statute, and is granted on a case-by-case basis. Nonautomatic relief under Regs. Sec. 301.9100-3 will be granted only when it can be shown that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

The IRS deems the taxpayer to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer:

  • Requests relief before the IRS discovers the taxpayer's failure to make the election; 
  • Failed to make the election because of events beyond the taxpayer's control;
  • Failed to make the election because, after exercising reasonable diligence (taking into account the taxpayer's experience and the complexity of the return or issue), the taxpayer was unaware of the necessity for the election;
  • Reasonably relied on the written advice of the IRS; or
  • Reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

The IRS deems the taxpayer to have acted unreasonably and not in good faith if the taxpayer:

  • Seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has been or could be imposed at the time the taxpayer requests relief (taking into account any qualified amended return filed) and the new position requires or permits a regulatory election for which relief is requested;
  • Was informed in all material respects of the required election and related tax consequences but chose not to file the election; or
  • Uses hindsight in requesting relief.

One of the factors the IRS weighs in determining whether granting relief will cause prejudice to the government is whether it will result in a lower tax liability for the taxpayer than if the taxpayer had timely filed the election. If the election affects the tax consequences of more than one taxpayer, prejudice is determined by looking at the aggregate effect of relief on the affected taxpayers' tax liability. The IRS takes the time value of money into account when determining prejudice.

Requesting nonautomatic relief under Regs. Sec. 301.9100-3 does not suspend the statute of limitation on assessment. Therefore, the IRS may condition a grant of relief on the taxpayer's consenting to extend the period for assessment for the year the taxpayer should have made the election and any other years affected by the election. Additionally, to receive nonautomatic relief, taxpayers must waive all objections to a second examination of the issues and corresponding adjustments affected by the relief.

Requests for nonautomatic relief must be accompanied by affidavits. The taxpayer, or his or her representative, must submit an affidavit describing in detail the events and circumstances surrounding the failure to timely make the election and the failure's discovery. If the taxpayer's reliance on professional advice led to the failure, the affidavit needs to include detailed information about the engagement and the responsibilities of the professional and the extent of the reliance.

The taxpayer must also include affidavits from his or her tax return preparer and any other individual who substantially participated in preparing the return. If the taxpayer sought advice from an accountant or tax attorney regarding the election, the request for relief must include affidavits from these individuals as well. Practitioners may be wary about submitting the affidavits, particularly if the practitioner's oversight was responsible for the failure to make the election. The prudent practitioner should consider notifying his or her malpractice carrier and seeking advice from counsel before taking corrective action under Regs. Sec. 301.9100-3.

Furthermore, all of the affidavits submitted pursuant to a request for nonautomatic relief must be accompanied by a declaration that states, under penalties of perjury, that the facts in the request are true to the best of the declarant's knowledge and belief and that all the relevant facts are included. The person making the affidavit must sign and date the declaration.

Requests for nonautomatic relief must follow the procedures for requesting a private letter ruling, including paying user fees. The procedures for requesting a letter ruling generally are described in the first revenue procedure of each year (e.g., Rev. Proc. 2014-1). The IRS customarily includes appendices designed to assist practitioners to request a letter ruling, including ones that describe the user fees, contain a sample letter ruling request that practitioners can use as a template, provide a checklist designed to assist practitioners with ensuring that the letter ruling request is complete, and list the addresses where the practitioner or taxpayer should send the request.

By following relief procedures in Regs. Secs. 301.9100-1 through -3, practitioners can often remedy an omission of a timely election after its due date.


Valrie Chambers is a professor of accounting at Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi in Corpus Christi, Texas. Seth Kossman is a member of the Tax and Business groups at Ober Kaler Grimes & Shriver PC in Baltimore. Mr. Kossman is a member of the AICPA IRS Advocacy & Relations Committee. For more information about this column, contact Prof. Chambers at valrie.chambers@gmail.com.





Tax Insider Articles


Business meal deductions after the TCJA

This article discusses the history of the deduction of business meal expenses and the new rules under the TCJA and the regulations and provides a framework for documenting and substantiating the deduction.


Quirks spurred by COVID-19 tax relief

This article discusses some procedural and administrative quirks that have emerged with the new tax legislative, regulatory, and procedural guidance related to COVID-19.