Reassessing the tax benefits of IC-DISCs

By Mayra Pena, CPA, MST, Chicago, and Richard Shapland, CPA, MBA, Madison, Wis.

Editor: Mark Heroux, J.D.

In recent years, the IC-DISC, or interest charge domestic international sales corporation, has been considered the last tax incentive available to U.S. exporters and has generated significant federal tax benefits to IC-DISC shareholders.

An IC-DISC is a legal entity organized as a C corporation that, in most cases, is deemed to act as a sales commission agent for a U.S. manufacturer or distributor that exports U.S.-made products. For an entity to be treated as an IC-DISC for federal income tax purposes, IRS approval is required. An IC-DISC must also maintain a bank account, keep separate accounting records, and file federal (and possibly state) income tax returns. On the other hand, an IC-DISC needs no employees or offices and does not physically perform any services or participate in export sales even though it is entitled to a commission. Effectively, an IC-DISC is a shell company that creates permanent tax savings for its owners by virtue of the Internal Revenue Code and related Treasury regulations.

The allowable IC-DISC commission is generally determined by reference to qualifying export sales on a transaction-by-transaction basis, although some grouping of transactions is permitted. The amount of the commission that can be paid to the IC-DISC is calculated using one of three pricing methods:

  • 4% of qualified gross export receipts (QER), plus 10% of the IC-DISC's export promotional expenses attributable to those receipts;
  • 50% of the combined taxable income (CTI) generated by qualified exports, plus 10% of the IC-DISC's export promotional expenses attributable to that income; or
  • Taxable income based upon the sale price actually charged but subject to the Sec. 482 transfer-pricing rules.

The federal tax benefits generated by the IC-DISC structure are recognized in the following manner:

  • The U.S. exporter is permitted to calculate and pay a commission to the related IC-DISC and claim an ordinary deduction for the commission expense.
  • The IC-DISC receives the commission income, which is not subject to federal tax because IC-DISCs are statutorily tax-exempt.
  • The IC-DISC dividends paid to an IC-DISC shareholder (a U.S. individual taxpayer or a flowthrough entity owned by U.S. individual taxpayer(s)) are subject to federal taxation at the preferential capital gains rates.
  • The difference between the tax rate benefit allowed for the ordinary deduction for the commission expense and the capital gains rate applied to the IC-DISC dividend generates a permanent federal tax rate arbitrage opportunity.

The key to maximizing IC-DISC-related tax benefits is proper structuring of the legal entities involving the export sales activity and the receipt of IC-DISC dividends by U.S. individual taxpayers. Common structures involve flowthrough entities such as partnerships, limited liability companies, and S corporations that are owned by U.S. individuals and export U.S.-made products. Because the preferential rate on IC-DISC dividends is limited to individuals, C corporations are taxed at regular rates on IC-DISC dividends. Therefore, a C corporation-owned IC-DISC offers no permanent tax rate arbitrage opportunity.

A flowthrough exporter can establish an IC-DISC that it owns directly. The commission the exporter pays to the related IC-DISC is deductible as an expense and yields a federal tax benefit to the exporter's individual owners at their applicable ordinary income tax rates. The commission income of the tax-exemptIC-DISC is treated as accumulated earnings eligible for distribution to its shareholders. The IC-DISC dividends paid to the exporter (the only shareholder of the IC-DISC) retain their character as dividends qualifying for the preferential capital gains rates and flow through to the individual owners of the exporter. Therein lies the federal tax rate arbitrage opportunity: The commission expense creates a tax benefit at ordinary income tax rates while the dividend income is taxed at the qualifying dividend income tax rate. Before 2018, that rate differential was as high as 15.8% (i.e., a 39.6% tax rate benefit for commission expense less 23.8% tax on the IC-DISC dividend income).

As a result of P.L. 115-97, the law known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), effective for 2018, the highest U.S. individual tax rate was reduced to 37% or, in certain instances, 29.6% for those receiving the new Sec. 199A qualified business income deduction; the 23.8% highest U.S. individual tax rate on qualifying dividend income remains unchanged. Note here that the rate differential could shrink to as low as 5.8%, as shown in the example.

Example: Assume the following: (1) a 4% of export sales commission rate; (2) the highest applicable individual tax rates including the net investment income tax of 3.8%; and (3) the flowthrough entity that owns the IC-DISC claims the full 20% Sec. 199A qualified business income deduction. The federal tax rate benefit for IC-DISC structures owned by S corporations in 2018 and beyond can be calculated as follows:

  • S corporation shareholder tax benefit rate for commission deduction = 37% × 80% = 29.6%.
  • S corporation shareholder tax rate on IC-DISC dividends received = 20% + 3.8% net investment income tax = 23.8%.
  • Permanent tax rate differential = 29.6% - 23.8% = 5.8%.

This represents a significant reduction in the federal tax benefit associated with this type of IC-DISC structure and should prompt reconsideration of the continued viability of some IC-DISCs, in particular when export sales are less than $2 million. That is, the costs associated with tax compliance and maintenance of the IC-DISC might outweigh the tax benefits, which in the case of $2 million in export sales could be lower than $5,000. Affected taxpayers should reconsider whether the ongoing tax benefits of their IC-DISC will continue to exceed the costs of the structure and, if not, liquidate the IC-DISC or allow it to remain unused and dormant.

Further, another common structure involving a closely held C corporation with a sister IC-DISC may no longer provide a favorable rate differential due to the reduced corporate tax rate of 21% introduced by the TCJA. That is, the tax benefit of the IC-DISC commission deduction will be only 21%, whereas the tax rate on the IC-DISC dividend could be as high as 23.8%. In those cases, taxpayers should explore a new structure with a new IC-DISC and either liquidate the old IC-DISC or allow the old IC-DISC to remain dormant if the taxpayer believes that federal tax rates may change again in the future. The authors also expect an increased frequency of conversions of S corporations to C corporations because of the TCJA rate changes. Here again, the viability of any existing IC-DISC should be revisited.

Taxpayers are encouraged to reassess the ongoing tax benefits of their IC-DISCs due to tax rate differential changes as a result of the TCJA. Because of these changes, taxpayers may find that the tax benefits of using an IC-DISC no longer outweigh the compliance and maintenance costs associated with one.


Mark Heroux, J.D., is a principal with the National Tax Services Group at Baker Tilly Virchow Krause LLP in Chicago.

For additional information about these items, contact Mr. Heroux at 312-729-8005 or

Unless otherwise noted, contributors are members of or associated with Baker Tilly Virchow Krause LLP.

Tax Insider Articles


Business meal deductions after the TCJA

This article discusses the history of the deduction of business meal expenses and the new rules under the TCJA and the regulations and provides a framework for documenting and substantiating the deduction.


Quirks spurred by COVID-19 tax relief

This article discusses some procedural and administrative quirks that have emerged with the new tax legislative, regulatory, and procedural guidance related to COVID-19.