Skip to content

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; others help us improve the user experience. By using the site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Read our privacy policy to learn more.

Close
aicpa-logo-black
  • AICPA Resources:
  • AICPA-CIMA.com
  • Tax Section
  • Store
The Tax Adviser
  • INDIVIDUALS
    • All articles
    • Credits
    • Deductions
    • Income
    • Specialized Issues

    Latest Stories

    • IRS warns taxpayers: Social media advice can lead to costly penalties
    • Treasury posts preliminary list of jobs eligible for no tax on tips
    • Tax strategies for highly appreciated undeveloped land
    • Draft 2026 Form W-2 includes boxes and codes for tips and overtime
  • PASSTHROUGHS
    • All articles
    • S Corporations
    • Partnerships & LLCs
    • Contributions, Distributions & Basis
    • Reporting & Filing Requirements

    Latest Stories

    • Signing partnerships’ returns and other tax documents
    • Prop. regs. would modify reporting obligations for Form 8308, Part IV
    • IRS includes several AICPA recommendations in corporate AMT interim guidance
    • Potential recapture pitfall for profits-interest partners
  • CORPORATIONS
    • All articles
    • Deductions
    • Formation & Reorganizations
    • Income
    • Reporting & Filing Requirements

    Latest Stories

    • AI is transforming transfer pricing
    • Guidance on research or experimental expenditures under H.R. 1 issued
    • AICPA presses IRS for guidance on domestic research costs in OBBBA
    • IRS includes several AICPA recommendations in corporate AMT interim guidance
  • ESTATES
    • All articles
    • Estate Tax
    • Gift Tax
    • Tax Computation
    • Types of Trusts

    Latest Stories

    • Estate tax considerations for non-US persons owning US real estate
    • The final countdown: Benefiting from the higher BEA before it potentially expires
    • Proposed regulations update QDOT regulations
  • PROCEDURE
    • All articles
    • Collections & Liens
    • Representations & Examinations
    • Tax Planning & Minimization

    Latest Stories

    • IRS warns taxpayers: Social media advice can lead to costly penalties
    • Treasury posts preliminary list of jobs eligible for no tax on tips
    • Tax Court addresses dueling motions to dismiss
    • Scope of review in passport cases is de novo
  • Home
  • News
  • Magazine
  • Topics
Advertisement
  1. newsletter
  2. TAX INSIDER
TAX INSIDER

New Partnership Audit Procedures Will Have a Profound Impact

The biggest change to partnership tax audits since TEFRA is going to be effective soon.

By Todd Radde, CPA, J.D., LL.M.
October 6, 2016

Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2016. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.

Related

September 1, 2016

Violating Certain “Bad Boy” Guarantees Can Trigger Recourse Liabilities

August 4, 2016

IRS Issues Temporary Regulations on Early Elections of New Partnership Audit Procedures

July 1, 2016

Partnership Audit Rules for the Next Decade

TOPICS

  • Partnership & LLC Taxation
    • Reporting & Filing Requirements

On Nov. 2, 2015, President Barack Obama signed the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (the Act), P.L. 114-74. The Act contained several significant changes to the procedural rules for federal income tax audits and the judicial process applicable to partnerships and other entities classified as partnerships for federal income tax purposes, such as limited liability companies. The changes are a departure from how partnerships have been treated for federal income tax purposes.

In the past, partnerships were treated as flowthrough entities and were not subject to federal income tax. Under the new rules, partnerships are still flowthrough entities, but any taxes due after an audit can be collected from the partnership, saving the IRS from pursuing individual partners. This change was achieved when the Act repealed the current federal audit procedures for partnerships enacted by the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) and replaced them with the following rules. The new rules will have a profound impact on existing and new partnerships.

The federal income tax audit or judicial proceedings will continue to be conducted at the partnership level as under TEFRA, but the first major change is that a tax liability, including penalties and interest, from a federal income tax audit or judicial proceeding will be imposed directly on the partnership and not on the partners individually. Adjustments to the partnership’s income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit for a particular year (called the “review year”) are taken into account by the partnership in the year that the federal income tax audit or judicial proceeding is completed (called the “adjustment year”). This change shifts the ultimate tax consequences from the partners of the partnership in the review year to the partners of the partnership in the adjustment year.

The tax imposed on the partnership in the adjustment year is calculated by taking all of the adjustments to the partnership’s income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit for the review year and netting them together. This net amount of adjustment is then multiplied by either the highest individual or the highest corporate tax rate that was in effect in the review year. This “imputed underpayment” is imposed on the partnership in the adjustment year.

Adjustments to the allocation between partners will not be netted but instead will be taken into account only to increase allocations of income or decrease the allocations of deductions to the particular partner. For example, a partnership may owe an imputed underpayment because of an incorrect allocation of items of income or deduction among partners.

The imputed underpayment may be reduced by (1) the partners filing amended tax returns and making the related tax payment for the review year, (2) applying the correct tax rate to specific partners (such as tax-exempt entities), or (3) considering the type of income subject to the adjustment (such as capital gains). After the proposed partnership adjustment is mailed, the partnership has 270 days to submit the necessary information and documentation to the IRS to modify the imputed underpayment. The IRS must approve all modifications to the partnership’s imputed underpayment.

The amended tax return modification rule requires that one or more partners file returns for the tax year of the partner that includes the end of the partnership’s reviewed year, the amended returns take into account all adjustments properly allocable to those partners (and for any other tax year for which any tax attribute is affected by reason of those adjustments), and a payment of any tax due is included with the amended returns.

As an alternative to the partnership’s paying imputed underpayment itself, the partnership can elect, within 45 days of receiving an IRS final notice of partnership adjustment, to issue statements to the IRS and the partners who were partners in the review year, setting out the partners’ share of any adjustment to the partnership’s income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit. The partners receiving these statements will be required to take the adjustments into account on their individual tax returns for the year in which the adjustment statements are issued. A reviewed year partner’s tax for the adjustment year is increased by the sum of (1) the amount that partner’s tax for the reviewed year and for subsequent years before the year the adjustment statements are issued increases from taking the partner’s share of the adjustments into account for that year plus (2) the increases in the partner’s tax due to the adjustment to tax attributes in those years.

In addition, those partners will owe interest and penalties if applicable. Penalties will be determined at the partnership level. Interest will be determined at the partner level from the due date of the return for the tax year to which the increase is attributable, but the interest rate will be 2 percentage points higher than the rate that normally apples to tax underpayments.

A partnership also has the option to file a request for an administrative adjustment for the review year when the partnership’s position is that an additional payment is due or an overpayment was made. The adjustment will be taken into account in the adjustment year at the partnership level. The partnership can also use the alternative method for an administrative adjustment by issuing adjustment statements to each of the partners that were partners in the review year.

These new partnership audit procedure rules are effective for partnership tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017. A partnership may elect to apply the new rules for tax years beginning after Nov. 2, 2015, and before Jan. 1, 2018.

On Aug. 5, 2016, the IRS published temporary and proposed regulations for partnerships wanting to elect into the new partnership audit procedural rules. Temp. Regs. Sec. 301.9100-22T and Prop. Regs. Sec. 301.9100-22 provide guidance on how, when, and where a partnership can elect into the new partnership audit regime. 

If a partnership chooses to elect into the new partnership audit regime early, the partnership must provide a written statement with the words “Election under Section 1101(g)(4)” written at the top of the election statement. The statement must also include:

  • The partnership’s name, taxpayer identification number (TIN), and the partnership tax year for which the election is being made;
  • The name, TIN, address, and daytime telephone number of the individual who signs the statement;
  • An affirmative statement that the partnership is electing the application of Section 1101(c) of the Act for the partnership return for the eligible tax year identified in the notice of selection for examination;
  • The name, TIN, address, and daytime telephone number of the partnership representative, as defined under Sec. 6223, and any additional information required by the applicable regulations, forms and instructions, and other guidance issued by the IRS;

The statement must also contain the following representations:

  • The partnership is not insolvent and does not reasonably anticipate becoming insolvent before the resolution of any adjustment with respect to the partnership tax year for which the election is being made;
  • The partnership has not filed, and does not reasonably anticipate filing, voluntarily, a petition for relief under Title 11 of the U.S. Code;
  • The partnership is not subject to, and does not reasonably anticipate becoming subject to, an involuntary petition for relief under Title 11 of the U.S. Code; and
  • The partnership has sufficient assets, and reasonably anticipates having sufficient assets, to pay a potential imputed underpayment with respect to the partnership tax year that may be determined under Subchapter C of Chapter 63 of the Internal Revenue Code as amended by the Act.
  • The statement is signed under penalties of perjury, that the individual signing the statement is duly authorized to make the election, and that, to the best of the individual’s knowledge and belief, all of the information contained in the statement is true, correct, and complete.

The statement must be dated and signed by the tax matters partner, as defined under Sec.  6231(a)(7) (before amendment by the Act, i.e., under TEFRA) and the applicable regulations, or an individual who has the authority to sign the partnership return for the tax year under examination under Sec. 6063, the regulations, and applicable forms and instructions.

Under the new partnership audit rules the “tax matters partner” designation for federal income tax audits or judicial proceedings was repealed and replaced by the “partnership representative.” Each partnership needs to designate a partnership representative who is a person, not necessarily a partner, with a substantial presence in the United States. If the partnership has not designated a partnership representative, the IRS will select one.

The partnership representative is the only person who will receive notice of any administrative proceeding that has been initiated, notice of any proposed partnership adjustment, and notice of any final partnership adjustment. The partnership representative has the sole authority to act on behalf of the partnership during a federal income tax audit or judicial proceeding. The partnership representative’s decisions have a binding effect on the partnership and all of its partners in a federal income tax audit or judicial proceeding.

To elect into the new partnership audit regime early, the partnership must have designated a partnership representative and provided the necessary information on the election statement. The election statement must be signed by the tax matters partner or the individual with the authority to sign the partnership return under review, but not the partnership representative (if different). The partnership must make this election within 30 days of the date of notification to the partnership, in writing, that a tax return of the partnership for an eligible tax year has been selected for examination by a notice of selection for examination. An eligible tax year means any partnership tax year that begins after Nov. 2, 2015, and before Jan. 1, 2018, with a few exceptions. Those exceptions are:

  • If the tax matters partner has filed an administrative adjustment request under Sec. 6227(c) (under TEFRA);
  • The partnership is deemed to have filed an administrative adjustment request under Sec. 6227(c) (also under TEFRA); or
  • An amended return of partnership income has been filed or has been deemed to be filed for the partnership tax year.

Upon the receipt of a valid election, the IRS will mail, not before the date that is 30 days after receiving a valid election, a notice of administrative proceedings to the partnership and the partnership representative.

A partnership that has not been issued a notice of selection for examination can still make an election for the partnership for an eligible tax year for the purpose of filing an administrative adjustment request under current Sec. 6227. No election for an administrative adjustment request can be made before Jan. 1, 2018, unless the partnership has been issued a notice of selection for examination. If an administrative adjustment request is filed before Jan. 1, 2018, it will be deemed to have been filed under Sec. 6227(c) (TEFRA).

Todd D. Radde (tradde@taylorenglish.com) is a tax lawyer at Taylor English Duma in Atlanta. He has experience in a wide variety of tax law areas, having worked in a Big Four accounting firm, law firms, and a Fortune 100 company.

A version of this article previously appeared on the Taylor English website.   

Advertisement

Latest News

September 9, 2025

IRS warns taxpayers: Social media advice can lead to costly penalties

September 8, 2025

Global tax deal could hurt US companies, says letter requesting OECD guidance

September 4, 2025

Treasury posts preliminary list of jobs eligible for no tax on tips

August 31, 2025

AI is transforming transfer pricing

August 30, 2025

2025 tax software survey

Advertisement

Most Read

Partnership distributions: Rules and exceptions
Current developments in S corporations
Reporting aspects of Sec. 743(b) adjustments
The Sec. 645 election to treat a trust as part of the estate
Partnership Capital Account Revaluations: An In-Depth Look at Sec. 704(c) Allocations
Guidance on research or experimental expenditures under H.R. 1 issued
Advertisement

employee benefits & pensions

Abstract image of pie chart, with pieces being pulled from several directions. IMAGE BY VECTORMINE/ADOBE STOCK

Profits interests: The most tax-efficient equity grant to employees

By granting them a profits interest, entities taxed as partnerships can reward employees with equity. Mistakes, however, could cause challenges from taxing authorities.

Tax Clinic

Proposed regulations issued on retirement catch-up contributions

IC-DISC commission payment provisions

The role of REITs for foreign investors in US real estate

Signing partnerships’ returns and other tax documents

Practical considerations for taxpayers and advisers following Loper Bright and Corner Post

Magazine

August 2025

August 2025

August 2025
July 2025

July 2025

July 2025
June 2025

June 2025

June 2025
May 2025

May 2025

May 2025
April 2025

April 2025

April 2025
March 2025

March 2025

March 2025
February 2025

February 2025

February 2025
January 2025

January 2025

January 2025
December 2024

December 2024

December 2024
November 2024

November 2024

November 2024
October 2024

October 2024

October 2024
SEPTEMBER 2024

SEPTEMBER 2024

SEPTEMBER 2024
view all

View All

http://view-all

JOIN

AICPA Tax Section

Your go-to source for tax developments and professional insights. Tap into expert guidance, tools, news, and career development.

Connect

  • x-logo The Tax Adviser on X
  • Linkedin AICPA Tax Practitioners on Linkedin

HOME

  • News
  • Monthly issues
  • Tax Insider articles
  • Topics
  • RSS feed rss feed
  • Sitemap

ABOUT

  • About The Tax Adviser
  • Contact us
  • Submit an article
  • Advertise
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & conditions

JOIN/SUBSCRIBE

  • AICPA Tax Section
  • CPE Express

AICPA & CIMA Sites

  • AICPA-CIMA.com
  • Journal of Accountancy
  • Financial Management (FM)
  • Global Engagement Center
  • Global Career Hub
aicpa-logo-black

© 2025 Association of International Certified Professional Accountants. All rights reserved.