Skip to content

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; others help us improve the user experience. By using the site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Read our privacy policy to learn more.

Close
aicpa-logo-black
  • AICPA Resources:
  • AICPA-CIMA.com
  • Tax Section
  • Store
The Tax Adviser
  • INDIVIDUALS
    • All articles
    • Credits
    • Deductions
    • Income
    • Specialized Issues

    Latest Stories

    • Social Security wage base and COLA announced for 2026
    • AICPA seeks IRS guidance on tip, overtime tax deductions for 2025
    • Annual inflation adjustments announced for tax year 2026
    • Transactions between related parties
  • PASSTHROUGHS
    • All articles
    • S Corporations
    • Partnerships & LLCs
    • Contributions, Distributions & Basis
    • Reporting & Filing Requirements

    Latest Stories

    • Partnership recapitalization: Lender admittance without liability reduction
    • Outlier or beginning of a trend? Illinois redefines investment partnerships
    • Signing partnerships’ returns and other tax documents
    • Prop. regs. would modify reporting obligations for Form 8308, Part IV
  • CORPORATIONS
    • All articles
    • Deductions
    • Formation & Reorganizations
    • Income
    • Reporting & Filing Requirements

    Latest Stories

    • The R&D tax credit for architects and engineers
    • Company’s $1.6 billion ‘break fee’ payment treated as ordinary deduction
    • IRS ruling clarifies treatment of R&D when computing the FDII deduction
    • IRS withdraws prop. regs. affecting corporate spinoff transactions
  • ESTATES
    • All articles
    • Estate Tax
    • Gift Tax
    • Tax Computation
    • Types of Trusts

    Latest Stories

    • Estate tax considerations for non-US persons owning US real estate
    • The final countdown: Benefiting from the higher BEA before it potentially expires
    • Proposed regulations update QDOT regulations
  • PROCEDURE
    • All articles
    • Collections & Liens
    • Representations & Examinations
    • Tax Planning & Minimization

    Latest Stories

    • Congress passes bill requiring IRS to clarify math error notices
    • AICPA seeks IRS guidance on tip, overtime tax deductions for 2025
    • IRS offers relief on car loan interest reporting under H.R. 1
    • Annual inflation adjustments announced for tax year 2026
  • Home
  • News
  • Magazine
  • Topics
Advertisement
  1. newsletter
  2. TAX INSIDER
TAX INSIDER

Capital contribution of reduced basis S corporation debt

This method provides a practical alternative to a taxable repayment.

By Andrew M. Brajcich, J.D., LL.M., CPA
December 20, 2018

Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2018. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.

Related

December 1, 2018

Filing a timely S election

November 1, 2018

Loan guarantee does not increase S corp. shareholder’s debt basis

November 1, 2018

Shareholder cannot unilaterally change an S corp.’s election

TOPICS

  • S Corporation Income Taxation
    • Distributions & Shareholder Basis

According to the IRS Statistics of Income website, there are more Forms 1120S, U.S. Income Tax Return for an S Corporation, filed than any other business entity (4.6 million S corporation returns were filed in 2014, compared with 3.8 million partnership returns and 2.2 million corporate returns (IRS Data Book, 2014, Table 2)).

While the S corporation has many of the same passthrough characteristics of the runner-up for entity choice, the partnership, a major difference is the rules governing the passthrough of losses to owners. Generally, losses of the S corporation are passed through to the shareholders to the extent the shareholder has basis in her stock and, once all stock basis is exhausted, to the extent the shareholder has basis in debt to the corporation. It is important to note that stock basis is used first and then losses may pass through to the extent that the shareholder has made a loan directly to the corporation.

Guarantees are generally not considered debt for these purposes unless and until the shareholder makes payment on the debt to a third party. These rules differ from the rules for passing through losses from a partnership to its partners, which are available to the extent of the partner’s outside basis and include a partner’s share of partnership liabilities.

Any S corporation losses in excess of these stock and debt bases are carried over indefinitely until there is sufficient basis to pass the losses through to the shareholder. Generally, basis is restored by a shareholder’s capital contribution or the passthrough of income items to the shareholder. In a year subsequent to a year with excess losses, the S corporation may pass through current year income or gains as well as prior-year carryover losses. When restoring basis, the shareholder will generally first restore basis in the debt to the extent of the amount owed, and then restore basis in the stock.

In a year when basis adjustments are a net increase, meaning all positive adjustments (contributions, income, and gains) are greater than negative adjustments (distributions and losses), Sec. 1367(b)(2)(B) provides the taxpayer should first apply the net increase to the debt basis and the balance of positive adjustments to stock. This is referred to as the “net increase approach.” This rule provides the taxpayer with enough stock basis to make distributions tax-free during the year. Unlike a loss passthrough, distributions are only tax-free to the extent the shareholder has basis in the stock. Debt basis cannot be used to make tax-free distributions after stock basis is reduced to zero. Thus, a shareholder increases stock basis to the extent of distributions and losses, while increasing debt basis by the excess positive adjustments.

The repayment of debt, while typically a tax-free recovery of capital, will result in gain if the basis is less than the amount owed. If the debt is evidenced in writing, the gain will be capital. Otherwise, it is ordinary. If, for example, a taxpayer has a $100,000 note with a basis of $50,000 and the S corporation repays $50,000 in principal, the shareholder will have a capital gain of $25,000 on the repayment. This is because under Rev. Rul. 64-162, the shareholder cannot designate the entire payment as basis recovery; rather the recovery of capital is allocated proportionate to the basis and face value of the note ($50,000 repayment × $50,000 basis ÷ $100,000 owed), similar to the rules used in the installment sales method.       

A workaround

While seemingly straightforward, the S corporation loss limitation rules can present taxpayers with unique dilemmas. The following describes a possible workaround and related precautions when basis in debt is less than the amount owed, i.e., the “adjusted issue price” as determined under Regs. Sec. 1.1275-1(b). Specifically, the shareholder may make a capital contribution of reduced basis debt to the corporation. As you will see, making a capital contribution of debt to the corporation will increase the stock basis for the shareholder. This increase allows for additional tax-free distributions and is generally preferable to the proration of debt repayments under Rev. Rul. 64-162.

The capital contribution of debt may be treated under Sec. 351 or as a sale or exchange. For Sec. 351 to apply, the debt must be property. This generally means the debt is evidenced by writing (Sec. 351(d)(2)). Under Sec. 351, the contribution will be tax-free if the shareholder contributes property (note) in exchange for S corporation stock and the shareholder has control of the corporation immediately after the exchange. Control is a two-part test and is defined in Sec. 368(c) as 80% or more of both voting and all other classes of stock.

As a result of the Sec. 351 transaction, the shareholder will increase stock basis, which was zero, by the adjusted basis in the debt. If the issuance of additional stock would be a meaningless gesture, e.g., the shareholder owns 100% of the S corporation, additional shares need not be issued. However, if there is more than one shareholder and a shareholder contributes debt to the corporation while not receiving stock in exchange, there may be a deemed gift to the other shareholders as the value of their interest in the corporation has increased.

If the Sec. 351 requirements are not met, the general rule of Sec. 1001 will apply. Here, the tax treatment of the sale or exchange depends on whether the debt is in writing. If the debt is in writing, the shareholder is treated as having received an amount realized equal to the fair market value (FMV) of the S corporation stock. If that amount is greater than the adjusted basis in the debt, the shareholder recognizes a capital gain. If the amount is less than the shareholder’s debt basis, the shareholder may be disallowed the loss under the Sec. 267 related-party rules.

Under Sec. 267(b)(2), an individual shareholder and corporation are related parties when the individual owns more the 50% of the outstanding stock, directly or indirectly. Whether the 50% is measured prior to or after the contribution of debt is not entirely clear in Regs. Sec. 1.267(a)-1(a). In the absence of the application of Sec. 267, the shareholder’s loss is capital. In all circumstances, the initial basis in the newly received stock is its FMV at the time of the exchange.

When the debt is not in writing, i.e., an open account, the transfer of stock to the shareholder is treated as payment on the open account in an amount equal to the FMV of the stock. The shareholder will have ordinary income or loss depending on the stock’s FMV as compared to the basis in corporate debt. Similar treatment results when replacing an open account with a note, which is a taxable exchange under Regs. Sec. 1.1001-3. However, the gain may be recognized under the installment sales method. Given the capital character of the gain and the potential to draft a note within the straight-debt safe harbor guidelines of Sec. 1361(c)(5), which reduce the risk of having the debt be recharacterized as a second class of stock resulting in the inadvertent termination of S status, it is advisable to put shareholder loans in writing. The challenge, as many practitioners can attest, is when shareholders seek tax services after an open account liability has been in place for some time. 

If the stock is received in full satisfaction of the debt, the S corporation may have cancellation-of-debt income. Under Sec. 108(e)(6), the corporation is treated as satisfying the debt with money equal to the shareholder’s basis in the debt, not adjusted for income and loss items of the S corporation that have previously passed through to the shareholder. Thus, the contribution will rarely result in cancellation-of-debt income because the basis in the debt will likely equal the amount owed. Additionally, if the value of the stock is less than the adjusted basis in the debt, the shareholder may have a bad debt deduction under Sec. 166.

Nonbusiness bad debts are treated as a short-term capital loss and are subject to the netting rules seen on Schedule D, Capital Gains or Losses, of Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, and the $3,000 maximum (unindexed) net capital loss deduction. Business bad debts are ordinary losses and thus are generally preferable. Under Sec. 108(e)(7), however, gain on the sale of stock acquired for debt where an ordinary loss was incurred by the shareholder will be subject to Sec. 1245 recapture.

A final consideration is the net investment income tax. If a shareholder does not materially participate in the S corporation’s business, any gain on the satisfaction of the note is investment income for purposes of the 3.8% net investment income tax.      

The passthrough of S corporation losses to the extent of the shareholder’s basis in his or her stock and debt can be beneficial; however, the resulting reduced basis debt may lead to taxable income on repayment of the debt. Shareholders may wish to consider contributing the reduced basis debt to the corporation as a tax-efficient alternative to taxable repayments of the debt.

Andrew M. Brajcich is an associate professor of accounting in the School of Business Administration at Gonzaga University in Spokane, Wash. To comment on this article or to suggest an idea for another article, please contact Sally Schreiber, senior editor, at Sally.Schreiber@aicpa-cima.com.

Advertisement

Latest News

October 24, 2025

Social Security wage base and COLA announced for 2026

October 22, 2025

Congress passes bill requiring IRS to clarify math error notices

October 22, 2025

AICPA seeks IRS guidance on tip, overtime tax deductions for 2025

October 21, 2025

IRS offers relief on car loan interest reporting under H.R. 1

October 9, 2025

Annual inflation adjustments announced for tax year 2026

Advertisement

Most Read

IRS shutdown plan: Employees stay on the job for first 5 workdays
The Sec. 645 election to treat a trust as part of the estate
Understanding Qualified Domestic Trusts and Portability
Partnership distributions: Rules and exceptions
Current developments in taxation of individuals: Part 1
IRS furloughs nearly half its workers, closes most operations
Advertisement

TAX PRACTICE MANAGEMENT

Image of happy, sad and neutral smiley faces.

2025 tax software survey

AICPA members in tax practice assess how their return preparation software performed during tax season and offer insights into their procedures.

Tax Clinic

IRS ruling clarifies treatment of R&D when computing the FDII deduction

Like-kind exchanges of real estate: Building on the basics

New legislation seeks to address disaster relief refund claim discrepancies

Partnership recapitalization: Lender admittance without liability reduction

Technology and tax standards: Understanding new SSTS Section 1.4 — Reliance on Tools

Magazine

September 2025

September 2025

September 2025
August 2025

August 2025

August 2025
July 2025

July 2025

July 2025
June 2025

June 2025

June 2025
May 2025

May 2025

May 2025
April 2025

April 2025

April 2025
March 2025

March 2025

March 2025
February 2025

February 2025

February 2025
January 2025

January 2025

January 2025
December 2024

December 2024

December 2024
November 2024

November 2024

November 2024
October 2024

October 2024

October 2024
view all

View All

http://view-all

JOIN

AICPA Tax Section

Your go-to source for tax developments and professional insights. Tap into expert guidance, tools, news, and career development.

Connect

  • x-logo The Tax Adviser on X
  • Linkedin AICPA Tax Practitioners on Linkedin

HOME

  • News
  • Monthly issues
  • Tax Insider articles
  • Topics
  • RSS feed rss feed
  • Sitemap

ABOUT

  • About The Tax Adviser
  • Contact us
  • Submit an article
  • Advertise
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & conditions

JOIN/SUBSCRIBE

  • AICPA Tax Section
  • CPE Express

AICPA & CIMA Sites

  • AICPA-CIMA.com
  • Journal of Accountancy
  • Financial Management (FM)
  • Global Engagement Center
  • Global Career Hub
aicpa-logo-black

© 2025 Association of International Certified Professional Accountants. All rights reserved.