Skip to content

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; others help us improve the user experience. By using the site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Read our privacy policy to learn more.

Close
aicpa-logo-black
  • AICPA Resources:
  • AICPA-CIMA.com
  • Tax Section
  • Store
The Tax Adviser
  • INDIVIDUALS
    • All articles
    • Credits
    • Deductions
    • Income
    • Specialized Issues

    Latest Stories

    • Details on IRS prop. regs. on tip income deduction
    • IRS releases draft form for tip, overtime, car loan, and senior deductions
    • IRS warns taxpayers: Social media advice can lead to costly penalties
    • Treasury posts preliminary list of jobs eligible for no tax on tips
  • PASSTHROUGHS
    • All articles
    • S Corporations
    • Partnerships & LLCs
    • Contributions, Distributions & Basis
    • Reporting & Filing Requirements

    Latest Stories

    • Signing partnerships’ returns and other tax documents
    • Prop. regs. would modify reporting obligations for Form 8308, Part IV
    • IRS includes several AICPA recommendations in corporate AMT interim guidance
    • Potential recapture pitfall for profits-interest partners
  • CORPORATIONS
    • All articles
    • Deductions
    • Formation & Reorganizations
    • Income
    • Reporting & Filing Requirements

    Latest Stories

    • AI is transforming transfer pricing
    • Guidance on research or experimental expenditures under H.R. 1 issued
    • AICPA presses IRS for guidance on domestic research costs in OBBBA
    • IRS includes several AICPA recommendations in corporate AMT interim guidance
  • ESTATES
    • All articles
    • Estate Tax
    • Gift Tax
    • Tax Computation
    • Types of Trusts

    Latest Stories

    • Estate tax considerations for non-US persons owning US real estate
    • The final countdown: Benefiting from the higher BEA before it potentially expires
    • Proposed regulations update QDOT regulations
  • PROCEDURE
    • All articles
    • Collections & Liens
    • Representations & Examinations
    • Tax Planning & Minimization

    Latest Stories

    • AICPA urges IRS to modernize estate and trust tax forms
    • IRS finalizes regulations for Roth catch-up contributions under SECURE 2.0
    • IRS warns taxpayers: Social media advice can lead to costly penalties
    • Treasury posts preliminary list of jobs eligible for no tax on tips
  • Home
  • News
  • Magazine
  • Topics
Advertisement
  1. newsletter
  2. TAX INSIDER
TAX INSIDER

Maximizing deductions on like-kind exchanges using cost segregation

Tax advisers should consider tax basis calculation options on the exchanged properties before recommending a cost segregation study.

By Gian P. Pazzia
March 26, 2020

Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2020. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.

Related

February 1, 2020

Navigating tax changes with statistical sampling

February 1, 2020

Timing of revenue: Prop. regs. issued under Sec. 451(b)

February 1, 2020

Advance payments for goods and services

TOPICS

  • Tax Accounting
    • Capitalization & Depreciation
  • IRS Practice & Procedure

When a property is acquired in a Sec. 1031 like-kind exchange, tax preparers should consider several facts before deciding how to best depreciate the carryover basis from a relinquished property. When a cost segregation study is also considered on the newly acquired property, additional analysis is recommended before finalizing the Sec. 1031 tax basis calculations. Making matters more complicated, these Sec. 1031 tax basis calculations are needed before a cost segregation study can be recommended. This article will help practitioners understand how to maximize accelerated deductions by examining a number of Sec. 1031 exchange rules and how they are affected by cost segregation studies. 

Cost segregation and tax basis

A cost segregation study dissects the purchase price or “tax basis” of a building property that would normally be depreciated over 27.5 years for residential property or 39 years for commercial property. The primary goal of cost segregation is to identify components that are not real property and therefore can be depreciated faster (typically over five, seven, and 15 years). When a property is purchased in a Sec. 1031 exchange, the tax basis calculations can vary significantly depending on the circumstances. More information on this below.

Bonus depreciation

Current tax law allows for 100% bonus depreciation on certain property, new or used, purchased after Sept. 27, 2017. Bonus depreciation applies to property with a tax life of 20 years or less (i.e., it doesn’t apply to real property). As a result, a cost segregation study will identify tangible personal property that qualifies for bonus depreciation, thereby saving a significant amount on taxes. Furthermore, only the “excess basis” of property acquired after Sept. 27, 2017, through a Sec. 1031 exchange qualifies for bonus depreciation. Therefore, a property with large excess basis benefits significantly more from cost segregation because of bonus depreciation.

Example: A property was sold in a Sec. 1031 exchange for $1 million. There was $700,000 of depreciation leftover at the time of the exchange (aka “carryover basis”). The new property that is received in the Sec. 1031 exchange is purchased for  $1,500,000. Only the excess basis of $500,000 ($1,500,000 – $1,000,000) is eligible for bonus depreciation.  

Like-kind exchange depreciation options

Option 1: Generally, taxpayers must depreciate the carryover basis of property acquired in a like-kind exchange during the current tax year over the remaining recovery period of the property exchanged. They must use the same depreciation method and convention that was used for the relinquished property. Any excess basis is treated as newly placed in service property. Depreciation must be calculated separately for the carryover basis and the excess basis. This option is typically better when the relinquished property is closer to the end of its tax life.

Note: If this option is chosen, tax rules only allow a cost segregation study (for the new property) to apply to the excess basis, not to the carryover basis. Using the example above, a cost segregation study can only apply to $500,000. 

Option 2 (simplified method): Taxpayers can elect to treat the adjusted basis of the exchanged property as if it was disposed of at the time of the exchange. Under this election a taxpayer treats the carryover basis and excess basis for the acquired property as if placed in service on the date acquired. The depreciable basis of the new property is the adjusted basis of the exchanged property plus any additional amount paid for it (or “net tax basis”). By making this election, the taxpayer may be able to use a more favorable method of depreciation and simplify recordkeeping.

Note: Under this option, tax rules allow a cost segregation study to apply to the combined carryover basis and excess basis. Using the example above, the cost segregation allocations apply to “net tax basis” of $1,200,000 ($700,000 carryover + $500,000 excess basis). In this case, the benefits of cost segregation can be significantly higher than under Option 1. Please note that bonus depreciation is only applied to the excess basis, regardless of which option is chosen.    

Using the simplified method does not affect the application of like-kind exchange rules, or depreciation recapture rules, to the relinquished property. The election is made by attaching a statement to the income tax return indicating “Election made under Regs. Sec. 1.168(i)-6(i),” and describing the property.

When to recommend cost segregation studies

When a property is acquired using a Sec. 1031 exchange and cost segregation is also considered, tax preparers should contemplate maximizing the basis to which the cost segregation study can be applied. In addition, Sec. 1031 exchange basis calculations should be reviewed before recommending cost segregation studies to clients. Without this understanding, a cost segregation proposal may grossly overstate (or understate) potential tax savings. As such, planning ahead and working with a cost segregation firm that is highly experienced with 1031 exchanges is key. 

— Gian P. Pazzia, CCSP, a principal in KBKG‘s national Cost Segregation group, is a recognized leader in his field. Among his many accomplishments, he has provided expert witness testimony before the IRS. To comment on this article or suggest an idea for another article, contact Sally Schreiber, a Tax Adviser senior editor, at Sally.Schreiber@aicpa-cima.com. 

Advertisement

Latest News

September 19, 2025

Details on IRS prop. regs. on tip income deduction

September 19, 2025

AICPA urges IRS to modernize estate and trust tax forms

September 16, 2025

Preserving the limitation statute for ERC claims

September 15, 2025

IRS finalizes regulations for Roth catch-up contributions under SECURE 2.0

September 15, 2025

IRS releases draft form for tip, overtime, car loan, and senior deductions

Advertisement

Most Read

Partnership distributions: Rules and exceptions
Reporting aspects of Sec. 743(b) adjustments
The Sec. 645 election to treat a trust as part of the estate
Current developments in S corporations
Guidance on research or experimental expenditures under H.R. 1 issued
Treasury posts preliminary list of jobs eligible for no tax on tips
Advertisement

employee benefits & pensions

Abstract image of pie chart, with pieces being pulled from several directions. IMAGE BY VECTORMINE/ADOBE STOCK

Profits interests: The most tax-efficient equity grant to employees

By granting them a profits interest, entities taxed as partnerships can reward employees with equity. Mistakes, however, could cause challenges from taxing authorities.

Tax Clinic

Proposed regulations issued on retirement catch-up contributions

IC-DISC commission payment provisions

The role of REITs for foreign investors in US real estate

Signing partnerships’ returns and other tax documents

Practical considerations for taxpayers and advisers following Loper Bright and Corner Post

Magazine

August 2025

August 2025

August 2025
July 2025

July 2025

July 2025
June 2025

June 2025

June 2025
May 2025

May 2025

May 2025
April 2025

April 2025

April 2025
March 2025

March 2025

March 2025
February 2025

February 2025

February 2025
January 2025

January 2025

January 2025
December 2024

December 2024

December 2024
November 2024

November 2024

November 2024
October 2024

October 2024

October 2024
SEPTEMBER 2024

SEPTEMBER 2024

SEPTEMBER 2024
view all

View All

http://view-all

JOIN

AICPA Tax Section

Your go-to source for tax developments and professional insights. Tap into expert guidance, tools, news, and career development.

Connect

  • x-logo The Tax Adviser on X
  • Linkedin AICPA Tax Practitioners on Linkedin

HOME

  • News
  • Monthly issues
  • Tax Insider articles
  • Topics
  • RSS feed rss feed
  • Sitemap

ABOUT

  • About The Tax Adviser
  • Contact us
  • Submit an article
  • Advertise
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & conditions

JOIN/SUBSCRIBE

  • AICPA Tax Section
  • CPE Express

AICPA & CIMA Sites

  • AICPA-CIMA.com
  • Journal of Accountancy
  • Financial Management (FM)
  • Global Engagement Center
  • Global Career Hub
aicpa-logo-black

© 2025 Association of International Certified Professional Accountants. All rights reserved.