Advertisement
Topics

The research credit: Business-component requirement

The Fifth Circuit’s decision in Grigsby, 86 F.4th 602 (5th Cir. 2023), emphasizes the need for taxpayers to clearly define business components when preparing and documenting their Sec. 41 credit.

Employee retention credit updates

Practitioners need an understanding of claim disallowance appeals and requests for additional
information, as well as insight into how the voluntary disclosure program may affect practitioners themselves.

Overlapping expenses affect multiple tax credit calculations

The Fourt Circuit affirmed the Tax Court’s decision that a taxpayer could not ignore the coordination rule in Sec. 45C(c)(2) when calculating the Sec. 41 research credit for a tax year in which the taxpayer claimed the Sec. 45C orphan drug credit for qualified clinical testing expenses that also were qualified research expenses for purposes of the research credit.

The CHIPS Act’s advantageous direct-pay election

This article summarizes the key features of the direct-pay election for the advanced manufacturing credit, which allows taxpayers to treat the credit as a direct payment against their federal income tax.

A process of experimentation: Production expenses for the R&D tax credit

When claiming research and development tax credits, a taxpayer may be able to include production activities in the “substantially all” calculation by presenting detailed evidence that those production activities constitute a process of experimentation under Sec. 41(d)(3)(A).

Recapture considerations for Inflation Reduction Act credits

The Inflation Reduction Act not only created $663 billion in new energy-related credits over 10 years, but it also expanded opportunities to monetize many of the energy tax credits through direct payment and transfer elections.

Rights for the R&D credit and Sec. 174

When claiming the Sec. 41 research and development credit for funded research, a taxpayer must determine whether it possesses economic risk related to the success of the research and retains substantial rights to the research results. How that correlates to a “right to exploit” research under Sec. 174 still needs clarification.

The research credit: Adaptation exclusion

A recent Tax Court case sheds light on the uncertainty test for qualified research activities and its relation to the adaptation exclusion of expenditures eligible for the Sec. 41 research credit.

The research credit: Documenting qualified services

Court decisions delineate common pitfalls for companies claiming the Sec. 41 credit of substantiating qualified research expenditure amounts and whether the company followed a process of experimentation.