Advertisement
TOPICS / CORPORATIONS

Violation of Public Policy and the Denial of Deductions

Recent events have drawn attention to the disallowance of deductions where allowing the deductions would violate public policy. This article discusses the disallowance of deductions under Sec. 162 and Sec. 165 for public policy reasons.

Deductibility of Forbearance Payments

In Media Space, Inc., the Tax Court held that a corporation’s payments to its shareholders to delay redemption of their preferred shares were generally deductible under Sec. 162. However, the court further held that a company would be required to capitalize forbearance agreement payments under the 12-month rule in Regs. Sec. 1.263(a)-4(f)(1) if there was a reasonable expectancy of the agreement’s renewal.

Payments Under Forbearance Agreements Held Partially Deductible

The Tax Court held that payments by a company to investors for agreeing to temporarily forgo making an election to redeem stock were not interest payments; however, it further held that some of the payments were deductible ordinary and necessary business expenses.

Deepwater Horizon and Sec. 162

This item examines the deductibility of fines and penalties incurred by BP in the Deepwater Horizon explosion.

Allocations of Sec. 179D Deductions by Government Building Owners

To meet new emissions reduction targets, federal agencies are likely to continue including more requirements in contracting protocols throughout the government’s supply chain. While these energy-efficiency targets create opportunities for designers under Sec. 179D, they can also create challenges for suppliers and others contracting with the government when determining who has the authority to allocate these tax benefits.

Sec. 199: Domestic Production Activities Deduction

Since 2004, Sec. 199 has allowed as a deduction a percentage of qualifying production expenses, with “production” defined broadly and requiring only that it take place “in significant part” within the United States.

Transaction Cost Update

This item discusses recent taxpayer-favorable guidance provided by the IRS and the Tax Court on the tax treatment of transaction costs.

Sec. 199 Deduction and Government Contractors

Although the domestic production activities deduction (DPAD) came into law in 2004, certain types of taxpayers eligible for the deduction–including contractors doing business with the federal government–often fail to claim it on their income tax returns.

Treatment of Prior-Period Expenses under Sec. 199

Taxpayers that are eligible for the domestic production activities deduction under Sec. 199 often face the difficult question of how to properly allocate prior-period expenses between activities that created domestic production gross receipts (DPGR) and activities that did not create DPGR (non-DPGR).

Charitable Contribution of Qualified Conservation Easement

The Tax Court held that a conservation easement of air space over an historic structure that was donated by a taxpayer to a nonprofit organization did not meet the requirements to be considered a qualified conservation easement.

Merger Termination Fee Deductible

The Tax Court held that a termination fee paid by the taxpayer to cancel a merger agreement in order to consummate a more lucrative merger was deductible.

Sec. 199 Issues Arising from Contract Manufacturing Arrangements

In order to determine whether the taxpayer or the contract manufacturer is entitled to the Sec. 199 deduction for the same manufacturing activity, the Sec. 199 rules require an analysis of which party in a contract manufacturing relationship has the “benefits and burdens of ownership” under judicially developed federal income tax principles.