Advertisement
TOPICS

Who Can or Must File a Form 1099-C?

With taxpayers and businesses defaulting on credit and loans, tax advisers may consider whether their clients should issue a Form 1099-C for a bad debt.

Inflation Adjustments for 2013

The IRS released its annual revenue procedure making inflation adjustments to the gift tax annual exclusion and other items for tax years beginning in 2013.

Tax Court Cannot Reopen Whistleblower Award Claim

In a case of first impression, the Tax Court held that it could not reopen a whistleblower claim where the IRS decided not to pursue the case and never instituted an action or collected any proceeds.

Rev. Proc. Updates Guidance on Adequate Disclosure of Return Positions

The IRS released its annual update identifying when a taxpayer’s disclosure of an item or position in an income tax return is adequate for purposes of reducing the understatement of tax penalty and the tax return preparer penalty for understatement due to unreasonable positions.

Effective Date of Tangible Property Regs. Delayed

The IRS announced it is delaying the effective date of the temporary regulations it issued in Dec. 2011 governing whether tangible property expenses could be deducted or had to be capitalized.

One-Time Abatement of $5,000 Frivolous Filing Penalty Announced

Taxpayers who have filed all required tax returns and paid all outstanding tax liabilities, including penalties (except for the Sec. 6702 penalty) and related interest, may qualify for a one-time reduction to $500 of any unpaid penalties that the IRS has assessed.

Treatment of Identity Theft Returns Clarified

The IRS Office of Chief Counsel explained what the IRS can do when a return is filed by an identity thief and the IRS has issued a statutory notice of deficiency based on that fraudulent return.

IRS Nonacquiesces to 47-Year-Old Case

The IRS announced it will not follow the decision in International Business Machines Corp. in which the Court of Claims held that the IRS could only apply an adverse ruling prospectively if applying it retroactively would treat the taxpayer who requested the ruling differently from a taxpayer who received a favorable ruling on the same subject.