Advertisement
TOPICS / PASSTHROUGHS

Split Widens as Courts Hold Basis Overstatement Is Not Income Omission

The ongoing controversy over whether a taxpayer’s overstatement of basis triggers a six-year statute of limitation period continues as the Fourth Circuit and Fifth Circuit both held within days of each other that the extended period does not apply. These decisions are at odds with a Seventh Circuit opinion issued in January and with regulations finalized in December.

Current Developments in Partners and Partnerships

This article reviews and analyzes recent rulings and decisions involving partnerships. The discussion covers developments in partnership formation, debt and income allocations, distributions, passive activity losses, and basis adjustments during the period November 1, 2009–October 31, 2010.

IRS Maintains Stance on Omissions from Gross Income and Overstatement of Basis

The IRS released final regulations defining an omission from gross income for purposes of the six-year minimum period for assessment of tax attributable to partnership items and the six-year period for assessing tax. The regulations are designed to resolve whether an overstatement of basis in a sold asset results in an omission from gross income.

Appeals Court Overturns Taxpayer Win in Tax Shelter Case

The Tenth Circuit held that a taxpayer’s investment in a “son of boss” tax shelter lacked economic substance and therefore did not generate deductible losses, reversing a taxpayer win on the issue in which a district court had allowed the taxpayer to deduct losses from the investment.

Potential Implication of Recent Sec. 469 Court Decisions for Self-Employment Tax Rules

For purposes of self-employment taxes, many members of LLCs have treated themselves as limited partners and have therefore reported that their distributive share of income was not subject to self-employment tax under Sec. 1402(a)(13). If recent Sec. 469 court cases were to be applied beyond Sec. 469, this self-employment tax position might be more difficult to sustain.

Current Developments in Partners and Partnerships

This article reviews and analyzes recent rulings and decisions involving partnerships. The discussion covers developments in partnership formation, debt and income allocations, distributions, passive activity losses, and basis adjustments.

LLC Interests as Limited Partnership Interests: Sec. 469 Revisited

The focus of recent cases has been on application of the “limited partner” rule of Sec. 469(h)(2) and, based on the specific language contained in Temp. Regs. Sec. 1.469-5T, whether an interest in an LLC should be treated as an “interest in a limited partnership as a limited partner.”

LLCs, LLPs, and the Passive Loss Rules

Sec. 469(h)(2) treats a limited partner’s losses from an interest in a limited partnership as presumptively passive. The IRS has taken the position that a taxpayer who is a member of an LLC or LLP that is taxed as a partnership should be treated as a limited partner and therefore any losses passed through to the member are passive activity losses.

Partnership Structural Changes: Deductibility of Expenses

This item examines several partnership restructuring transactions and discusses the circumstances in which a restructuring expense can be deducted and amortized under Sec. 709 or must be capitalized under Regs. Sec. 1.263(a)-5(a).

Interest Deduction on Debt-Financed Distributions

Editor: Kevin F. Reilly, J.D., CPA Although the real estate market has cooled off in many areas, the value of commercial properties seems to have been less affected than that of residential properties. In fact, many commercial properties continue to be worth substantially more than their historic cost. Most commercial

Rulings Relax Related-Party Exchange Rules

Editor: Annette B. Smith, CPA Recently released IRS Letter Rulings 200709036 and 200706001 suggest a liberal trend regarding related-party exchanges under Sec. 1031(f). The rulings may indicate a more favorable Service attitude toward exchanges in which the related parties have not cashed out of their original investments through “abusive” basis-shifting.