The IRS issued final regulations (T.D. 9542) governing elections by individual taxpayers, corporations, and partnerships to deduct start-up expenses or organizational expenditures.
This two-part article discusses in the S corporation area. Part I covers new tax laws, court cases, regulations, revenue procedures, and rulings on various S corporation administrative and operating provisions.
The IRS issued final regulations governing elections by individual taxpayers, corporations and partnerships to deduct startup expenses or organizational expenditures.
Treating self-created customer-based intangibles as assets separate from goodwill can result in more favorable tax treatment for these intangibles. This article examines the rules regarding the separate treatment of self-created customer-based intangibles and the situations in which separate treatment may be beneficial.
This article looks at recent court decisions regarding S corporation shareholder reasonable compensation that provide helpful guidance on how an adviser can determine what is reasonable compensation.
A shareholder materially participates in an S corporation if the shareholder or the shareholder’s spouse is involved in the corporation’s trade or business on a regular, continuous, and substantial basis. This column discusses three tests that practitioners are likely to encounter when dealing with S corporation shareholders.
This item discusses whether a partnership should take a partner’s Sec. 743(b) adjustment into account in determining eligible basis of qualified energy property that the partnership has not yet placed in service.
The decision in Renkemeyer, Campbell & Weaver, LLP, signals that special allocations not supported by a written partnership agreement and without substantial economic effect will not withstand an IRS challenge and that classification of an interest in a partnership as a limited partner interest should not be predicated simply on a partner’s enjoyment of limited liability.
Final regulations set the time for automatic extensions of partnership, trust and estate income tax returns at five months (T.D. 9531). Under this rule, the extended returns and Schedules K-1 for partners and beneficiaries will generally be due September 15.
The recent decision of the Tax Court in Canal Corp. may provide some insight into when a partner’s potential obligation to pay partnership debts will be disregarded in determining liability allocations.
A recent district court decision highlights the employment tax risks to S corporations that are found to have paid unreasonably low compensation to shareholder-employees while making distributions to the same individuals.
The IRS issued proposed regulations that provide rules regarding who is the “taxpayer” for purposes of applying the Sec. 108 discharge of indebtedness rules to a grantor trust or disregarded entity.
This item discusses what target allocations are and how they determine income allocations during a year. It also examines some special issues with target allocations.
This item reviews the recent decision by the Tax Court in Canal Corp. and illustrates the limitations of the leveraged partnership exception to the disguised sale rules of Sec. 707(a)(2)(B).
The ongoing controversy over whether a taxpayer’s overstatement of basis triggers a six-year statute of limitation period continues as the Fourth Circuit and Fifth Circuit both held within days of each other that the extended period does not apply. These decisions are at odds with a Seventh Circuit opinion issued in January and with regulations finalized in December.
The Small Business Jobs Act changes the S corporation built-in gains (BIG) tax for tax years (and only for tax years) beginning in 2011. This article discusses the increased opportunities this affords buyers to elect to treat purchases of S corporation stock as asset purchases without triggering BIG tax.
In Fisher, the IRS has again won on the issue of whether taxpayers’ transfers of partnership interests were transfers of present interests in property. The court held the transfers did not qualify for the gift tax annual exclusion.
A federal appeals court has handed the IRS another defeat on the issue of whether an overstatement of basis amounts to an omission from gross income for purposes of invoking the longer, six-year limitation period for assessing tax under Sec. 6501(e).