In the Garnett case, the Tax Court set precedent for the reporting of losses from LLPs and LLCs by limited liability partners who materially participate in the operations of the businesses in which they are investors.
This two-part article discusses recent legislation, cases, rulings, regulations, and other developments in the S corporation area. Part I covers operational issues; part II, in the November issue, will cover S corporation eligibility, elections, and termination issues.
This item examines several partnership restructuring transactions and discusses the circumstances in which a restructuring expense can be deducted and amortized under Sec. 709 or must be capitalized under Regs. Sec. 1.263(a)-5(a).
When a trust instrument is silent and no discretionary power of administration exists, trustees and their advisers need to be knowledgeable of how partnership activity (including both taxable income and distributions received) is affected by the trust administration statutes of the state of situs of the trust.
The Tax Court held that the taxpayers’ interests in their LLPs and LLCs were not presumptively passive because they did not hold their interests in the entities as limited partners in a limited partnership.
The Ninth Circuit has held in a group of consolidated cases that the Tax Court has jurisdiction to decide in partner-level proceedings whether a partnership’s transactions were tax motivated.
The IRS has issued a revenue ruling that addresses the question of whether, when a partnership becomes a corporation for federal tax purposes, it is eligible to elect to be taxed as an S corporation in its first tax year.
A partner in a consulting partnership who received restricted stock in the sale of her interest in the partnership to a corporation and agreed by contract to report the full value of the stock in income in the year the stock was transferred could not defer including part of the value of the stock in income until the year the restrictions on the stock were lifted.
The Fifth Circuit joined the majority of circuits and held that a lack of economic substance will invalidate the results of a transaction even if a taxpayer had a genuine motive other than tax avoidance for entering into the transaction.
This item discusses IPO II’s potential impact on allocating partnership liabilities under Sec. 752 and, given the decision, the unique considerations that must be taken into account in reaching a desired liability allocation among related partners.
An amendment to Sec. 1374(d) provides a temporary exemption from the application of Sec. 1374 to sales of assets in 2009 and 2010, but only for S corporations that meet certain requirements.
The IRS has issued proposed regulations on determining partners’ distributive shares of partnership items of income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit when a partner’s interest varies during a partnership tax year.
Given the current economy and the resulting decline in the value of investment partnership portfolios, tax practitioners must be familiar with the mandatory basis adjustments under Secs. 743 and 734 and the alternative rules for electing investment partnerships.
Under the economic outlay doctrine, to obtain basis in an S corporation with respect to debt, a shareholder must make an actual economic outlay, the outlay must somehow leave the shareholder poorer in a material sense, and the debt created must run directly between the shareholder and the S corporation.
In recent years, more and more partnership agreements have been drafted using the targeted capital account approach for allocating partnership items of income or loss (targeted capital approach) versus the typical Sec. 704(b) economic effect approach (waterfall approach).
This article highlights tax issues and planning opportunities that may arise relative to a distressed S corporation, its shareholders, and its creditors.
The Eighth Circuit reversed a district court and held that where a partnership paid a penalty under a closing agreement with the IRS, a partner in the partnership did not have standing to sue for a refund of part of the penalty payment.