The Fifth Circuit, overruling the Tax Court, held that for purposes of the Sec. 1402(a)(13) exclusion from self-employment tax, “limited partner” means a partner in a limited partnership that has limited liability.
Hedge funds may face tax issues of entity structuring, carried interest, management fee waivers, and trading-related rules. This article highlights planning strategies and compliance considerations as the IRS continues to increase its scrutiny of these investment vehicles.
In Soroban Capital Partners, the Tax Court analyzed the roles, responsibilities, and capital contributions of three limited partners in a limited partnership and determined that they were limited partners in name only.
The Tax Court found a regulation invalid to the extent it holds the period open for the IRS to issue a final partnership adjustment longer than the statutory 270 days after a partnership has submitted “everything required” for a complete modification request.
A recent Chief Counsel Advice memo underscores the importance of having the right person sign a partnership’s returns and other tax documents filed with the IRS.
Recent final regulations offer guidance as to what Treasury and the IRS may consider an eligible method for partnerships and Sec. 987 QBUs held by partnerships to determine Sec. 987 gain or loss.
Form 7217, Partner’s Report of Property Distributed by a Partnership, debuted for 2024, intended to apprise the IRS of factors in a partner’s basis computation.
Penalties for failure to file correct information returns and backup withholding can be waived, but timely and correct responses to IRS notices are essential.
To request a modification to an imputed underpayment from a Bipartisan Budget Act audit or push out the underlying adjustment, audited partnerships must use the IRS’s web-based service.
The IRS is providing relief from penalties imposed solely for failure to furnish Part IV of Form 8308 for partnerships by Jan. 31, 2025, if a partnership meets certain requirements.
The IRS issued regulations that finalize proposed regulations issued in 2013. The guidance is focused on when and to what extent a partner is treated as bearing the economic risk of loss and the special rules applying to a partner related to another partner.
To make a valid election into the Bipartisan Budget Act’s audit procedures, the IRS could not require the taxpayer to establish, as opposed to represent, that it had sufficient assets to pay any imputed underpayment, the Tax Court held.
States vary in their treatment of partnership adjustments made under the centralized partnership audit regime instituted by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015.
While the deposits can limit interest due on imputed underpayments under the centralized audit regime of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, ambiguities remain, including for push-out elections.
Partnerships’ administrative adjustment requests filed under the Bipartisan Budget Act rules can affect partners in disparate ways, including where adjustments flow through a tiered structure.
Partnerships do well to consider available elections and the power that partnership representatives wield under the audit procedures of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015.