Advertisement
Topics

California’s Click-Through Nexus Law

In 2011, California enacted a “click-through nexus” law requiring out-of-state online retailers to collect sales tax on all taxable sales of tangible personal property made through internet-based referrals, effective Sept. 2012.

New Developments in Sourcing Services for Telecommunication Companies

Effective planning and recordkeeping in the apportionment area call for an in-depth understanding of a taxpayer’s business model, including technology-based processes and the related cost accounting systems used, in order to source revenues to the appropriate jurisdiction.

AICPA Speaks Out Against Proposed Model Sales and Use Tax Statute

The AICPA testified at a hearing May 18 to voice its opposition to a model statute drafted by the Multistate Tax Commission (MTC) that would authorize states to require nonresident companies to report sales transactions with in-state consumers in an effort to increase use tax compliance.

Current Corporate Income Tax Developments (Part II)

This article covers some of the more important developments in the areas of apportionment, unitary groups/filing methods, administration, flowthrough entities, and other significant corporate state tax issues.

Tax Increases Contained in State Ballot Initiatives Soundly Rejected

On November 2, 2010, the midterm elections featured several ballot initiatives dealing with state tax matters. In most instances, voters rejected initiatives to the extent that they would raise taxes, implicitly requesting that their governments look for alternative means to solve their states’ budget deficits.

Click-Through Nexus and Information-Reporting Requirements

Affiliate nexus principles enable states to assert jurisdiction over out-of-state retailers that would not otherwise be required to collect and remit sales tax due to their lack of a physical presence. Not surprisingly, given the current budget shortfalls most states are facing, they have become increasingly aggressive in asserting affiliate nexus.

California’s Move to Single Sales Factor

Beginning January 1, 2011, multistate businesses may elect to use a single sales factor method of apportionment for purposes of their California corporate income tax return.

California S.B. 974’s Impact on California Enterprise Zones

Opponents of California’s Enterprise Zone (EZ) tax credit program have recently attacked its effectiveness, seeking to eliminate the use of targeted employment areas and retroactive vouchering, along with other modifications that would phase out the EZ in favor of a tax incentive program that focuses on improving California’s workforce development for future jobs.

Income Apportionment and Allocation after Mead

In MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Dep’t of Revenue, the Supreme Court held that the operational function test was not intended to modify the unitary business principle by adding a new ground for apportionment.

State and Federal NOL Rules Differ in Key Respects

State net operating loss (NOL) rules generally differ from federal NOL rules, and state NOL rules often differ from one another. This lack of consistency can lead to confusion about a taxpayer’s ability to utilize NOLs.

State Tax Considerations of Passthrough Entities

This column highlights areas of concern regarding state taxation of passthrough entities, including entity classification, conformity to federal tax conduit treatment, and tax reporting obligations.

Current Corporate Income Tax Developments (Part II)

During 2009, numerous state statutes were added, deleted, or modified; court cases were decided; regulations were proposed, issued, and modified; and bulletins and rulings were issued, released, and withdrawn. This article covers some of the more important developments in apportionment, unitary groups/filing methods, administration, flowthrough entities, and other significant corporate state tax issues.