Advertisement
Topics

Implications of the Supreme Court’s Moore decision

The Moore decision could support other forms of recognition of undistributed earnings by entities to their shareholders or members, particularly in the international sphere, as well as new proposed taxes on other forms of wealth.

FBAR penalties can violate Excessive Fines Clause

Because penalties for failure to report foreign bank and financial accounts reports are punitive in nature, they can violate the clause in the Eighth Amendment, the Eleventh Circuit held in Schwartzbaum.

Pillar Two and nonprofit organizations

Although the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting excludes nonprofit organizations, they may be subject to the rules if a subsidiary or group member engages in a trade or business.

Mandatory repatriation tax is constitutional

In Moore, the Supreme Court rebuffed a challenge to the one-time Sec. 965 tax on undistributed earnings of controlled foreign corporations attributed to U.S. shareholders.

Foreign partnership reporting requirements

U.S. persons owning an interest in a foreign partnership may be required to file Form 8865, and the partnership may also face additional U.S. filings.

Revisiting FIRPTA and return-of-capital distributions

Although the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act applies to foreign holders of U.S. real property interests, U.S. real property holding corporations also may find it advantageous to apply for a withholding certificate.

Taxpayer-initiated transfer pricing adjustments in MAP

When multinational enterprises proactively initiate transfer pricing adjustments to avoid penalties or for other reasons, a tax treaty’s mutual agreement procedure (MAP) can help prevent double taxation, but additional issues should be considered.