While the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Vainisi was favorable for S corporation banks investing in tax-exempt obligations, those banks nonetheless must pay close attention to the specific type of tax-exempt obligations they purchase if they expect to reap the benefits of that decision.
If a qualified subchapter S trust (QSST) owns both S corporation stock and other assets, determining whether the income from the other assets must be distributed to the beneficiary depends on the terms of the trust document.
This article reviews and analyzes recent rulings and decisions involving partnerships. The discussion covers developments in partnership formation, income allocations, and basis adjustments
An S corporation’s revocation of its S corporation status, which caused its QSub subsidiary to lose its status as a QSub, was not a post-bankruptcy-petition transfer of property of the QSub’s bankruptcy estate.
The Tax Court held that shareholders of an S corporation improperly increased the adjusted basis of their S corporation stock when the S corporation made a QSub election for its wholly owned C corporation subsidiary.
This article reviews and analyzes recent rulings and decisions involving partnerships. The discussion covers developments in partnership formation, income allocations, and basis adjustments.
During the period of this S corporation tax update, some major changes that directly affect S corporations took place. This article also presents tax planning ideas for S corporations and their shareholders.
A qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub) is a subsidiary corporation 100% owned by an S corporation that has made a valid QSub election for the subsidiary.
Under Letter Ruling 201122003, if a current ESBT allows for separate and independent trust shares under the trust document, a trust may be treated as both an ESBT and a QSST. This ruling opens the door for additional planning for gifts of S corporation stock to younger generations.
This article reviews and analyzes recent rulings and decisions involving partnerships. The discussion covers developments in partnership formation, debt and income allocations, distributions, passive activity losses, and basis adjustments during the period November 1, 2009–October 31, 2010.
In Vainisi, the Seventh Circuit reversed a decision in which the Tax Court held that the 20% interest expense reduction imposed by Sec. 291(a)(3) would apply to a qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub) bank even for its tax years following the third year after it converted from C corporation to S corporation status.
This article reviews and analyzes recent rulings and decisions involving partnerships. The discussion covers developments in partnership formation, debt and income allocations, distributions, passive activity losses, and basis adjustments.
An S corporation can elect to treat a 100% owned subsidiary as a qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub), which causes the subsidiary to be disregarded for most federal tax purposes. The subsidiary must be a corporation that would be eligible to be an S corporation if the shareholders of its parent S corporation held its stock directly.
The Tax Court held that taxpayers owning multiple interests in the same partnership were entitled to make different elections under Sec. 6223 for each interest.
Rev. Rul. 2008-18 posits two situations in which an S corporation becomes a QSub of a newly formed corporation that will qualify as an F reorganization. The ruling also provides new guidance on the proper employer identification number (EIN) to be used by the entities in each situation.